Caveant Parentes
Here's the situation.
Your kid has the opportunity of taking one of the following languages:
French, Spanish, German, Latin, Mandarin
Which one is best?
Hmmm, you think.
Well, if we go by what everybody else thinks, the answer is obvious.
(this requires us to be followers and easily persuaded by others, no matter how well thought out their reasoning is)
Mandarin, right? (linguistic flavor of the month and all that....and no, I don't judge books by their cover, unless the cover says "New York Times Best Seller", in which case, I run very fast and far in the other direction.)
If we go by perceived usefulness, then the answer is:
Spanish.
Right?
(Begging the question, what the heck do we mean by "usefulness"?)
If we go by Classical Education (What is "Classical Education"? What are "The Classics" or "Classics", for that matter?), the answer is:
Latin
I mean, hey, it's the root of 60 per cent of our words in English, so it'll help with SATs, etc. (as if the SATs are the be all and end all of an academic's existence - not)
or French (nobody speaks that any more - welllll, that's just a little off, as in wrong)
or German (might as well just speak English, right? uh, no)
Actually, the answer is:
none of the above.
You don't make this choice by language.
The learning of a language is automatically advantageous, regardless of what that language is.
The answer is,
In which is the the teacher superior?
Latin can be mistaught.
So can any language.
If the teacher is awful, or even so-so, your kid is in a lose-lose situation, no matter how interesting the subject matter may potentially be.
It will be an automatic turn off.
If the teacher is excellent, your kid is in a much better position to learn something tangible and real.
So, as I say above,
Caveant Parentes
Let The Parents Beware